PHOTOJOJO
   

The Photojojo Forum

We love photography!

You are not logged in

Login
Register
Home






Shop @ Photojojo!


The iPhone Lens Dial
A complete three-lens optical system for serious iPhoneographers: Fisheye, Wide Angle and Telephoto. More →



Fisheye, Wide/Macro, and Telephoto Phone Lenses
High-quality lenses to help you go pro with your camera phone pix. More →



The Telephoto iPhone Lens
A cell phone lens that's like a Sigma 500mm for your iPhone camera! More →



The iPhone SLR Mount
Turn your iPhone into a DSLR using real SLR lenses with this case adapter combo. More →



Holga iPhone Lens
A nine-in-one lens set with colorful, playful effects for your iPhone pics. More →



The Glif and Glif Plus (new!)
An elegantly engineered, infinitely flexible, tiny little stand and tripod mount for your iPhone 4 or iPhone 4S. More →



The iPhone Lens Wallet
Keep your iPhone goodies at the ready with this custom case that fits our Telephoto and Magnetic Lenses! It's the ultimate kit. More →



The iPhone Video Rig
Turn your iPhone into a Hand-held Video Rig. More →



Wood Camera iPhone Case
A laser engraved wood case that looks just like a vintage camera.More →







      



usutu6
2167 days ago
 
all those b & w negs

I'm considering the archive of a few hundred b & w negs which I shot 25 years ago - I want to digitize them, scan them in to my hard drive. Does anyone have experience with this? Scanners? Any kind or technique better than another? my goal is to make a collection of prints, optical ones using an enlarger and chemistry, but I need a way to look at them all first to decide which are worthy. Thanks for your thoughts...

@  Send to a friend
<a>  Link to this post





Nichole
2167 days ago
 
I tried to scan some negatives a few years ago, but it didn't work so well. It may have been my relatively cheap scanner. Good luck! (Sorry I don't have anything useful to say!)



@  Send to a friend
<a>  Link to this post





John
2167 days ago
 
If your main goal is to determine which ones to enlarge, I would recommend a light table.

Otherwise the Nikon Coolscan scanners work well though the old SCSI ones I used to work with were slow. You could also check with your local lab and see what it would cost to get them scanned for you. Scanning your own negs can be time consuming - especially with the scanners that use Digital I.C.E. which removes scratches, dust etc.. You'll need to make sure they are as clean as you can make them.

In true homebrew fashion I've heard of people using a macro lens with a rig on the end that held your slide. Light it from the back and you've got a simple way to convert negatives to digital. Though I haven't tried it, once everything was set up I'd suspect it would work quite well.

@  Send to a friend
<a>  Link to this post





shawn liu
2167 days ago
 
Hmm.  Using scanner to go through all the negatives would be a big pain in the arse.  I would recommend making some contact sheets - and then look through them.



@  Send to a friend
<a>  Link to this post





GreenTiger
2163 days ago
 
Speaking of contact sheets....Does anyone have a good technique to create digital "contact sheets" of slides or negs? Quick thumbnails that won't require trying to scan each slide seperately. I had tried photographing slides on a light table but didn't get very favorable results (though it wasn't a great light table).

Thanks



@  Send to a friend
<a>  Link to this post





usutu6
2148 days ago
 
In case anyone is following this, it seems that a combination of the practical ideas that came from you guys in response to my first post will be viable. I go to the light table at SMC, spend as much time as I can organizing strips into pages of good stuff in neg carrier pages, then make paper contact prints of each page. I file these with the negs and choose a few images that show promise. Some of them are really thin, delicate, some scratches, some with dirt on or in the emulsion. I'm advised to have these scanned professionally at the highest practical resolution,(4000 or 5000 d.p.i.) and work on them in Photoshop off line. I haven't got to this point yet, but i see the rational sense: fragile negs can only give so much optically in the darkroom, without a large investment in time, paper, chemistry etc. Efficiency rules.

@  Send to a friend
<a>  Link to this post


3790
 
Want to reply?

Login or Register


       Home

Page generated in 1369140381.0089 seconds