PHOTOJOJO
   

The Photojojo Forum

We love photography!

You are not logged in

Login
Register
Home






Shop @ Photojojo!


The iPhone Lens Dial
A complete three-lens optical system for serious iPhoneographers: Fisheye, Wide Angle and Telephoto. More →



Fisheye, Wide/Macro, and Telephoto Phone Lenses
High-quality lenses to help you go pro with your camera phone pix. More →



The Telephoto iPhone Lens
A cell phone lens that's like a Sigma 500mm for your iPhone camera! More →



The iPhone SLR Mount
Turn your iPhone into a DSLR using real SLR lenses with this case adapter combo. More →



Holga iPhone Lens
A nine-in-one lens set with colorful, playful effects for your iPhone pics. More →



The Glif and Glif Plus (new!)
An elegantly engineered, infinitely flexible, tiny little stand and tripod mount for your iPhone 4 or iPhone 4S. More →



The iPhone Lens Wallet
Keep your iPhone goodies at the ready with this custom case that fits our Telephoto and Magnetic Lenses! It's the ultimate kit. More →



The iPhone Video Rig
Turn your iPhone into a Hand-held Video Rig. More →



Wood Camera iPhone Case
A laser engraved wood case that looks just like a vintage camera.More →







      



tufteach
98 days ago
 
Fine Art Photography

I hope some of you will join me in this thread. I woud love to see the art you are creating using your photography.

The thing I enjoy doing most with my photography is creating art pieces. Besides my 365, that's what I will now focus on. So, you may see some in my 365 project.
Feedback appreciated.
In this piece I used the pods from an earlier 365 post. I played around with them and this is what I ended up with.
Texture by Doug Landreth.

I need to calibrate my screen as the colors are different when posting and a little too dark.

Click on image for better view.
http://forum.photojojo.com/img/posted/resized_img51410089c436c.jpg?url=http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8238/8554950743_1b8d9e120d_b.jpg
2013 72/2013 Pods by tufteach, on Flickr



@  Send to a friend
<a>  Link to this post





superdewa
97 days ago
 
Nice!

I have trouble, however, understanding what counts as fine art photography.


Flickr ~ Blog

@  Send to a friend
<a>  Link to this post





tufteach
97 days ago
 
superdewa
There are many, many different definitions of fine art photography. My personal definition is taking what I captured in the camera and creating what I consider a piece of art by manipulating the image, in what could end up being in many different ways--adding textures, other images, manipulating contrast, colors, etc. until the image is what I envisioned. It is an ongoing learning process for me.

I see much of what you do as fine art because you have your own unique style that I love.

Most of the pieces I have sold went way beyond SOOC.

Ultimately, as with beauty, art is in the eye of the beholder.



@  Send to a friend
<a>  Link to this post





superdewa
97 days ago
 
Thanks, TT! I never post SOOC -- I don't really "believe" in it. Even my scanned-in film photos are straightened, cropped, cleaned up (dust removed), sometimes color corrected, contrast added, dodged, burned, etc. RAW requires some editing, even if it is auto editing by whatever software you use, and JPEGs are edited by your camera, whether you realize it or not. I'd rather be the one in control of my photo editing, so I shoot in RAW and process.

However, I have come to understand, over the last few years, that my photography fits better into a stock/lifestyle/editorial category than into something people want hanging on their walls. I never set out to do commercial art, but the stock agencies and graphic designers seem to like what I do more than people looking to decorate their homes.

I think it's great that your pieces are selling and that you are working on your fine art portfolio.


Flickr ~ Blog

@  Send to a friend
<a>  Link to this post





tufteach
93 days ago
 
superd, I, too, shoot RAW and post process my images. To me, those are still considered SOOC unless i start adding or taking away to change the image.

Here's another artistic endeavor. Comments appreciated.

Click on image for best view.
http://forum.photojojo.com/img/posted/resized_img5147c7d52b0c3.jpg?url=http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8380/8569774743_03f22e51dd_b.jpg IMG_3908 by tufteach, on Flickr



@  Send to a friend
<a>  Link to this post





kdrake1007
93 days ago
 
I don't know, superd, there are some of your pieces that I would definitely hang on my wall!  I love so many of your fence shots, but I think I like your "kitchen" ones the best, like your food set.

TT, I love that last one!


Project 365 }-{ Pbase

@  Send to a friend
<a>  Link to this post





superdewa
92 days ago
 
Thanks!


TT -- I really like the quality and the processing, but I am somehow really confused by the angles or something. I can't not see that head as upside down, and it is confusing which direction it is flying. Maybe if you posted it larger I could see/


Flickr ~ Blog

@  Send to a friend
<a>  Link to this post





tufteach
92 days ago
 
Superd, you aren't the only one! Once it was pointed out, even I had trouble with it. I guess because I was there, I saw it as it is meant to be--rightside up. Its beak is pointed straight up as he just took off. Also, you can see its feet curled under him. I think I will work on it some more and see if I can make the image more clear. Thank you for your feedback.


PS: I would love to see other people's art pieces posted here.



@  Send to a friend
<a>  Link to this post





superdewa
92 days ago
 
This article just came up in my reader. I thought it might be interesting to you:
http://virtualphotographystudio.com/201 … otographer


Flickr ~ Blog

@  Send to a friend
<a>  Link to this post





gs_790
91 days ago
 
Bump


There's an M.C. Escher quality to that image that just keeps forcing you to look again to make sure you saw what you thought you saw. The distressed look of the print only ups the quality that makes you double-take.
Picasa
@  Send to a friend
<a>  Link to this post


906
 
Want to reply?

Login or Register


       Home

Page generated in 1371686777.6268 seconds